The shares of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. have decreased by more than -57.52% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -2.61% or -$0.37 and now trades at $13.83. The shares of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHRW), has slumped by -0.25% year to date as of 12/04/2018. The shares currently trade at $88.87 and have been able to report a change of -2.37% over the past one week.
The stock of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Tuesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.Profitability and Returns
Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. SLCA has an EBITDA margin of 17.53%, this implies that the underlying business of SLCA is more profitable. The ROI of SLCA is 7.40% while that of CHRW is 18.10%. These figures suggest that CHRW ventures generate a higher ROI than that of SLCA.Cash Flow
The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, SLCA’s free cash flow per share is a positive 2.25, while that of CHRW is positive 0.92.Liquidity and Financial Risk
The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for SLCA is 2.80 and that of CHRW is 1.90. This implies that it is easier for SLCA to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than CHRW. The debt ratio of SLCA is 0.93 compared to 0.90 for CHRW. SLCA can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than CHRW.Valuation
SLCA currently trades at a forward P/E of 22.31, a P/B of 0.78, and a P/S of 0.70 while CHRW trades at a forward P/E of 17.85, a P/B of 7.87, and a P/S of 0.75. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, SLCA is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.Analyst Price Targets and Opinions
The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of SLCA is currently at a -28.42% to its one-year price target of 19.32. Looking at its rival pricing, CHRW is at a -9.12% relative to its price target of 97.79.
When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), SLCA is given a 2.40 while 2.70 placed for CHRW. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for CHRW stocks.Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment
Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for SLCA is 5.68 while that of CHRW is just 9.04. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for SLCA stock.
The stock of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. defeats that of U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. when the two are compared, with CHRW taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. CHRW happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, CHRW is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for CHRW is better on when it is viewed on short interest.