Earnings

Comparing Top Moving Stocks Altaba Inc. (AABA), ING Groep N.V. (ING)

The shares of Altaba Inc. have decreased by more than -2.15% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 1.88% or $1.26 and now trades at $68.35. The shares of ING Groep N.V. (NYSE:ING), has slumped by -26.06% year to date as of 09/20/2018. The shares currently trade at $13.65 and have been able to report a change of 6.39% over the past one week.

The stock of Altaba Inc. and ING Groep N.V. were two of the most active stocks on Thursday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: -0.83% versus 6.80%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that AABA will grow it’s earning at a -0.83% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to ING which will have a positive growth at a 6.80% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of ING implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. The ROI of AABA is 8.60% while that of ING is 6.10%. These figures suggest that AABA ventures generate a higher ROI than that of ING.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, AABA’s free cash flow per share is a positive 2.48.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of AABA is 0.07 compared to 2.65 for ING. ING can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than AABA.

Valuation

AABA currently trades at a forward P/E of 4.17, a P/B of 0.87, and a P/S of 159.23 while ING trades at a forward P/E of 8.00, a P/B of 0.91, and a P/S of 1.28. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, AABA is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of AABA is currently at a -31.87% to its one-year price target of 100.33. Looking at its rival pricing, ING is at a -33.09% relative to its price target of 20.40.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), AABA is given a 2.40 while 1.00 placed for ING. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for AABA stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for AABA is 1.96 while that of ING is just 0.41. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for ING stock.

Conclusion

The stock of ING Groep N.V. defeats that of Altaba Inc. when the two are compared, with ING taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. ING happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, ING is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for ING is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Taking Tally Of Valero Energy Corporation (VLO), B... The shares of Valero Energy Corporation have increased by more than 24.19% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.65% or $0.74 and now trad...
Which of 2 stocks would appeal to long-term invest... The shares of Unum Group have decreased by more than -28.68% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 1.71% or $0.66 and now trades at $39.15. ...
Which is more compelling pick right now? – S... The shares of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. have decreased by more than -3.73% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.90% or -$0.35 and no...
Which Market Offer More Value? – Beacon Roof... The shares of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. have decreased by more than -44.75% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -4.73% or -$1.75 and n...
Uncovering the next great stocks: Chesapeake Energ... The shares of Chesapeake Energy Corporation have increased by more than 1.01% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.25% or -$0.01 and n...