Earnings

Set Sail With Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL), PBF Energy Inc. (PBF)

The shares of Colgate-Palmolive Company have decreased by more than -5.10% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.93% or $0.66 and now trades at $71.60. The shares of PBF Energy Inc. (NYSE:PBF), has jumped by 2.60% year to date as of 04/13/2018. The shares currently trade at $36.37 and have been able to report a change of 4.12% over the past one week.

The stock of Colgate-Palmolive Company and PBF Energy Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Friday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 8.12% versus 50.72%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that CL will grow it’s earning at a 8.12% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to PBF which will have a positive growth at a 50.72% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of PBF implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. CL has an EBITDA margin of 25.64%, this implies that the underlying business of CL is more profitable. The ROI of CL is 39.10% while that of PBF is 8.10%. These figures suggest that CL ventures generate a higher ROI than that of PBF.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, CL’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0.85, while that of PBF is positive 1.22.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for CL is 1.40 and that of PBF is 1.60. This implies that it is easier for CL to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than PBF.

Valuation

CL currently trades at a forward P/E of 20.89, and a P/S of 4.07 while PBF trades at a forward P/E of 9.28, a P/B of 1.72, and a P/S of 0.19. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, PBF is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of CL is currently at a -6.87% to its one-year price target of 76.88. Looking at its rival pricing, PBF is at a -2.57% relative to its price target of 37.33.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), CL is given a 2.70 while 2.80 placed for PBF. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for PBF stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for CL is 2.89 while that of PBF is just 3.29. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for CL stock.

Conclusion

The stock of PBF Energy Inc. defeats that of Colgate-Palmolive Company when the two are compared, with PBF taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. PBF happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, PBF is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for PBF is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Comparing Top Moving Stocks Discovery, Inc. (DISCK... The shares of Discovery, Inc. have increased by more than 20.45% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -3.04% or -$0.8 and now trades at $...
Comparing eBay Inc. (EBAY) and The Michaels Compan... eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY) shares are up more than 8.35% this year and recently increased 2.17% or $0.87 to settle at $40.89. The Michaels Companies, Inc...
Which of 2 stocks would appeal to long-term invest... The shares of Viking Therapeutics, Inc. have increased by more than 133.74% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -2.97% or -$0.29 and now...
Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (ALDX) Daily Technical ... Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALDX) gained 71.65% in yesterday’s session, going up from its prior closing price of $6.35 to $10.90, and has now r...
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTS) and Floor & De... Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTS) shares are up more than 4.17% this year and recently increased 1.52% or $0.15 to settle at $10.00. Floor & D...