The shares of Schlumberger Limited have increased by more than 0.83% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.58% or $0.39 and now trades at $67.95. The shares of Ross Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROST), has slumped by -5.08% year to date as of 04/13/2018. The shares currently trade at $76.17 and have been able to report a change of -1.65% over the past one week.
The stock of Schlumberger Limited and Ross Stores, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Friday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.Next 5Y EPS Growth: 46.64% versus 10.00%
When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that SLB will grow it’s earning at a 46.64% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to ROST which will have a positive growth at a 10.00% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of SLB implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.Profitability and Returns
Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. SLB has an EBITDA margin of 5.77%, this implies that the underlying business of ROST is more profitable. The ROI of SLB is -1.90% while that of ROST is 42.10%. These figures suggest that ROST ventures generate a higher ROI than that of SLB.Cash Flow
The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, SLB’s free cash flow per share is a positive 3.05, while that of ROST is positive 2.46.Liquidity and Financial Risk
The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for SLB is 1.20 and that of ROST is 1.60. This implies that it is easier for SLB to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than ROST. The debt ratio of SLB is 0.49 compared to 0.13 for ROST. SLB can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than ROST.Valuation
SLB currently trades at a forward P/E of 21.41, a P/B of 2.56, and a P/S of 3.10 while ROST trades at a forward P/E of 16.92, a P/B of 9.39, and a P/S of 2.11. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, SLB is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.Analyst Price Targets and Opinions
The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of SLB is currently at a -16.29% to its one-year price target of 81.17. Looking at its rival pricing, ROST is at a -13.69% relative to its price target of 88.25.
When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), SLB is given a 2.00 while 2.00 placed for ROST. This means that analysts are equally bullish on their outlook for the two stocks stocks.Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment
Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for SLB is 2.68 while that of ROST is just 2.24. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for ROST stock.
The stock of Schlumberger Limited defeats that of Ross Stores, Inc. when the two are compared, with SLB taking 4 out of the total factors that were been considered. SLB happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, SLB is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for SLB is better on when it is viewed on short interest.