The shares of Mylan N.V. have decreased by more than -3.04% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.12% or -$0.42 and now trades at $36.99. The shares of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ:LULU), has jumped by 4.11% year to date as of 12/05/2017. The shares currently trade at $67.66 and have been able to report a change of 1.18% over the past one week.
The stock of Mylan N.V. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Tueday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.
Next 5Y EPS Growth: 4.20% versus 11.91%
When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that MYL will grow it’s earning at a 4.20% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to LULU which will have a positive growth at a 11.91% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of LULU implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.
Profitability and Returns
Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. MYL has an EBITDA margin of 24.25%, this implies that the underlying business of MYL is more profitable. The ROI of MYL is 3.20% while that of LULU is 22.20%. These figures suggest that LULU ventures generate a higher ROI than that of MYL.
The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, MYL’s free cash flow per share is a positive 4.5, while that of LULU is positive 2.25.
Liquidity and Financial Risk
The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for MYL is 1.50 and that of LULU is 5.20. This implies that it is easier for MYL to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than LULU. The debt ratio of MYL is 1.11 compared to 0.00 for LULU. MYL can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than LULU.
MYL currently trades at a forward P/E of 6.90, a P/B of 1.49, and a P/S of 1.68 while LULU trades at a forward P/E of 24.98, a P/B of 6.59, and a P/S of 3.76. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, MYL is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.
Analyst Price Targets and Opinions
The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of MYL is currently at a -13.66% to its one-year price target of 42.84. Looking at its rival pricing, LULU is at a 3.3% relative to its price target of 65.50. This figure implies that over the next one year, LULU is a better investment.
When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), MYL is given a 2.20 while 2.30 placed for LULU. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for LULU stocks.
Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment
Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for MYL is 3.93 while that of LULU is just 3.73. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for LULU stock.
The stock of Lululemon Athletica Inc. defeats that of Mylan N.V. when the two are compared, with LULU taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. LULU happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, LULU is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for LULU is better on when it is viewed on short interest.