Global

Choosing Between Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) and Pacific Continental Corporation (PCBK)

Heritage Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:HFWA) and Pacific Continental Corporation (NASDAQ:PCBK) are the two most active stocks in the Regional – Pacific Banks industry based on today’s trading volumes. Investors are clearly interested in the two names, but is one a better choice than the other? We will compare the two companies across growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends to answer this question.

Growth

The ability to grow earnings at a compound rate over time is a crucial determinant of investment value. Analysts expect HFWA to grow earnings at a 10.00% annual rate over the next 5 years. Comparatively, PCBK is expected to grow at a 10.00% annual rate. All else equal, All else equal, the two stocks’ identical expected growth rates would imply a similar potential for capital appreciation..

Profitability and Returns



A high growth rate isn’t necessarily valuable to investors. In fact, companies that overinvest in low return projects just to achieve a high growth rate can actually destroy shareholder value. Profitability and returns are a measure of the quality of a company’s business and its growth opportunities. We’ll use EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI) to measure this. Heritage Financial Corporation (HFWA) has an EBITDA margin of 45.47%, compared to an EBITDA margin of 55.72% for Pacific Continental Corporation (PCBK). This suggests that PCBK underlying business is more profitable. HFWA’s ROI is 22.70% while PCBK has a ROI of 21.50%. The interpretation is that HFWA’s business generates a higher return on investment than PCBK’s.

Cash Flow 

The amount of free cash flow available to investors is ultimately what determines the value of a stock. HFWA’s free cash flow (“FCF”) per share for the trailing twelve months was +0.33. Comparatively, PCBK’s free cash flow per share was +0.31. On a percent-of-sales basis, HFWA’s free cash flow was 0.01% while PCBK converted 0.01% of its revenues into cash flow. This means that, for a given level of sales, HFWA is able to generate more free cash flow for investors.




Liquidity and Financial Risk

Liquidity and leverage ratios provide insight into the financial health of a company, and allow investors to determine the likelihood that the company will be able to continue operating as a going concern. HFWA’s debt-to-equity ratio is 0.04 versus a D/E of 0.16 for PCBK. PCBK is therefore the more solvent of the two companies, and has lower financial risk.

Valuation

HFWA trades at a forward P/E of 17.44, a P/B of 1.60, and a P/S of 5.79, compared to a forward P/E of 16.51, a P/B of 1.94, and a P/S of 5.37 for PCBK. HFWA is the cheaper of the two stocks on book value basis but is expensive in terms of P/E and P/S ratio. Given that earnings are what matter most to investors, analysts tend to place a greater weight on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions

A cheap stock is not necessarily a value stock. Most of the time, a stock is cheap for good reason. A stock only has value if the current price is substantially below the price at which it should trade in the future. HFWA is currently priced at a -7.71% to its one-year price target of $29.20. Comparatively, PCBK is -10.67% relative to its price target of $27.09. This suggests that PCBK is the better investment over the next year.

The average investment recommendation on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell) is 2.50 for HFWA and 3.00 for PCBK, which implies that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for PCBK.

Risk and Volatility

To gauge the market risk of a particular stock, investors use beta. Stocks with a beta above 1 are more volatile than the market as a whole. Conversely, a beta below 1 implies below average systematic risk. HFWA has a beta of 0.50 and PCBK’s beta is 0.77. HFWA’s shares are therefore the less volatile of the two stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest, or the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted, is another metric investors use to get a pulse on sentiment. HFWA has a short ratio of 2.14 compared to a short interest of 4.29 for PCBK. This implies that the market is currently less bearish on the outlook for HFWA.

Summary

Heritage Financial Corporation (NASDAQ:HFWA) beats Pacific Continental Corporation (NASDAQ:PCBK) on a total of 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks. HFWA generates a higher return on investment, has higher cash flow per share and has lower financial risk. Finally, HFWA has better sentiment signals based on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Choosing Between Edison International (EIX) and Am... Edison International (NYSE:EIX) and American Electric Power Company, Inc. (NYSE:AEP) are the two most active stocks in the Electric Utilities industry...
Centennial Resource Development, Inc. (CDEV) vs. B... Centennial Resource Development, Inc. (NASDAQ:CDEV) and Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (NYSE:BWP) are the two most active stocks in the Oil & Gas...
How Insiders and Institutions are Trading MacyR... Recent insider trends for Macy's, Inc. (NYSE:M) have caught the attention of investors. Analysts study insider data to get a sense of sense of what ke...
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. (CRZO) Technical Anal... Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. (NASDAQ:CRZO) fell by -0.54% in Tuesday’s trading session from $14.94 to $14.86 and has now fallen 3 consecutive sessions....
Which of 2 stocks would appeal to long-term invest... The shares of Halcon Resources Corporation have decreased by more than -30.65% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 3.75% or $0.19 and now ...